Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28042dede743e6e

Jump to content

Talk:Senega incarnata

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by UtherSRG in topic Correct species name?

Correct species name?

[edit]

According to Plants of the World Online Polygala incarnata L. is a synonym of Senega incarnata (L.) J.F.B.Pastore & J.R.Abbott. Unless there are objections I'm going to edit the page to reflect this and move it. Pinging @JosieM03, did you have a reason to create the article using the name Polygala incarnata, or is this an oversight? 🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at the links in the taxon bar at the bottom of the article. There's a significant split between those that place the species in Polygata and in Senega. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I've just updated the taxonbar and associated Wikidata. Significantly more use Polygala. WFO even has Polygala as accepted and Senega unplaced. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pointing things out, I needed to slow down instead of just blindly following POWO.
I'm not sure that significantly more are using Polygala out anything more than not having updated recently, though. The ones that list Polygala incarnata as the correct name do not list Senega incarnata as a synonym as I would expect if they were actively rejecting this revision. It still could be a case of "too soon" though.
Senega incarnata
Polygala incarnata
Easy enough to leave this be until more sources switch to Senega incarnata or POWO switches back. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
There has been a whole bunch of genus-level splitting in Polygalaceae recently (Pastore and Abbot are the major contributors of new combinations). I don't have any informed opinion about whether the splits are justified, but it seems to me that sources that don't follow the splits fall more under "not up to date" than "actively reject the splits". Plantdrew (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

User:UtherSRG do you object to this species and others in the Americas being Senega genus? I have been working on a bunch so want to make sure I am using the correct name. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

What you are replying to is old. At the time, it was WP:TOOSOON. Now, POWO has switched back, as we expected it would, so the move to Senega is appropriate. I note NatureServe has also switched to using Senega. - UtherSRG (talk) 03:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Removals

[edit]

I added:

Polygala species in the Americas were transferred to the Senega genus.

This was removed from the entry. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:27, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

New York distribution map

[edit]
Distribution in Mew York State

I added this map. I thought it was interesting. It's less than ideal since it only shows the distribution in New York State, but I post it here as of interest for some. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:30, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply