Talk:Semuc Champey
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2600:8804:670A:5700:F261:A58F:E502:C867 in topic Topographical categorization
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Topographical categorization
[edit]How should Semuc Champey be categorized? Would the limestone bridge and pools be considered a form of karst topography or similar feature? MarritzN (talk) 17:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- It should be listed of higher importance, areas that are natural national parks don't actually have enough protection and aren't well known enough. 2600:8804:670A:5700:F261:A58F:E502:C867 (talk) 01:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)