Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25d98202994b7b5

Jump to content

Talk:See Monster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Helpful987 in topic Audience engagement

Acceptance at AFC

[edit]

In my view this was borderline to accept. Rather than allowing it to languish and eventually fall foul of G13 I chose to accept it and allow the community to reach a conclusion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Origin of the drilling rig?

[edit]

I'm aware of WP:OR but bear with me.

I can't find a single scrap of info anywhere on the Internet on

1. Where in the North Sea this platform used to be 2. When it was built 3. When it was decommissioned 4. Where in the Netherlands it was refurbished 5. What its name used to be

Given the stated dismantling in two days, I think it'd be a shame not to track down and cite any of this for future historians. It is an essential part of the history of the structure. ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree that it would be good to know See Monster's former identity. I've also looked into it and it may have been one of the Amethyst platforms (run an image search and you'll see they look like See Monster). However, there is simply no information online to confirm this and so it seems redundant to have the request sitting there indefinitely. Helpful987 (talk) 22:48, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
FWIW a recent SomersetLive article claims it is a "450 tonne former gas platform". I checked the article and pleased we don't claim it was an "oil rig", though some of the cite titles do. When I visited, one of the staff said it had been used as an accommodation platform in its late life, but of course no cite for that. Rwendland (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
NB the creative director calls it an "oil rig" in the extlink interview I recently added, so the cites are quite contradictory, so we are sound to just call it an "offshore platform" in the article.Rwendland (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Audience engagement

[edit]

@Rwendland:, your edit summary says "the NAO numbers are just for See Monster, check Fig 9 on page 25/26". I can't see the NAO report in our citations. Do you have a link? Geof Sheppard (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The NAO report is the sixth reference. Data for individual Unboxed projects (including See Monster) can be found on page 25. Helpful987 (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply