Talk:Security forces
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tag
[edit]Reference point for anybody following the "disambiguation cleanup" tag to this page. I don't know what needs to be improved. I've read the MoS and it still isn't clear to me what specifically editors should do to improve this page - call me stupid, mentally impaired, whatever you wish. I'm just not seeing it and if this disambig violates a couple of guidelines they need to be stated more clearly. I don't approve of drive-by tagging, and even less when somebody just mutters something about "Mos violation" and leaves, without doing anything to resolve the issues himself or at least give everybody else a blerrie clue what he sees that needs fixing.
Some guesses I have (keep in mind these are guesses because nobody has informed me or anybody else what the problem is, since "MoS violation" is a very vague term):
- 1) References are not needed.
- 2) Introductory sentences are too long.
- 3) Not all the links should be listed.
Let me know what the problem is, discuss with the editors, but at least be a thorough WikiImp. Care about the page instead of just throwing egg on it.
Thanks, --Katangais (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)