Talk:Seaham
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Arlo Barnes in topic question
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article is a mess
[edit]The article for Dawdon puts this Seaham article to shame. It is a total shambles. The worst point, for me, is the repeated assumption that Dawdon is part of Seaham. It isn't. It is an entity on its own. (Own history, own pit, own parish boundary.) Someone needs to clean this up - and remove all claims to Dawdon's history etc etc.
question
[edit]should Chemical Beach redirect here? Arlo James Barnes 20:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)