Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2293cb0fcaf1709

Jump to content

Talk:Seagram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by AHampton in topic Infobox: website weirdness

Untitled

[edit]

why did the company fold? the article goes from: -Diversifying into the entertainment business in the 90s -Having Coca-Cola acquire their brand name from other companies. -Selling their entertainment arm to Vivendi, in the early 2000s

There are a few gaps, which need to be filled in. How did the company end up in bankruptcy? Or better yet, was it the responsibility of their entertainment diversification, which resulted in their inevitable demise?

Technically, Seagrams didn't fold. They "merged" with Vivendi, who then sold off the beverage divisions. It was Vivendi, then, who had financial issues under Jean Marie Messier, and which then had to sell off large portions of its holdings. This is outlined in the Vivendi article. This Seagram article could do with some touching up, though. ikes 17:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Seagram's Ginger Ale billboard Romulus Michigan.JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Seagram's Ginger Ale billboard Romulus Michigan.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unintelligible photo caption

[edit]

This makes no sense to me, I can't even parse it: "Seagram's Escapes Mickey Beverage Bodies." Can someone fix this? Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fixed it. Yes, that was a pretty strange caption. I'm surprised it stayed in the article so long before being improved. Trying to parse it, "Seagram's Escapes" is a brand of alcopop. Perhaps "Mickey Beverage" refers to an alcoholic beverage, since a "Mickey" is a beverage containing a psychoactive substance. Perhaps "Bodies" refers to the bottles shown in the advertisement or to the body of the truck? —BarrelProof (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Infobox: website weirdness

[edit]

I've just replaced the website within the infobox, which was one for just a singular former product ("Website www.seagramsgin.com"). The odd thing was that the gin website could not be located anywhere on the back end, as if it did not exist, though appeared on the page infobox, right under subsidiaries. How could the gin site have appeared in the infobox as a website when I just now added the word "website" to the infobox? Yet, my edit did replace what was there, when I did so, adding the archived site. How the gin site even existed is a mystery to me, as it could not be seen at all in editing mode. Any ideas? AHampton (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply