Talk:Scottish art/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

• File:Cadell, The Vase of Water.jpg needs a US copyright tag
• Aside from that one detail, I think this is meets GA criteria. For it to pass FA, it will probably need more development of the sculpture, decorative objects, textiles and other non-painting forms of art. This is a great overview - your work on Scotland is truly impressive. Thank you! - Lemurbaby (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

I have fixed that one issue. Many thanks for a rapid review. Much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)