Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23284691ebe2c82

Jump to content

Talk:Scott Stapp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Lp0 on fire in topic COI follow-up
[edit]

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1517207/intoxicated-scott-stapp-sparks-melee-with-311.jhtml


should this be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.101.12.20 (talk) 15:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

68th Greatest Metal Singer?

[edit]

If his enumeration was the 68th greatest Bollywood film it might be easier to take that number with a straight face. While I don't doubt there have been tens or hundreds of thousands of singers who have performed music in the metal genre, I'd be somewhat surprised if the total number of metal bands that have released professional albums is as high as 1500, a little less than one new metal band per week since Iron Maiden released "The Number of the Beast". The fact that the cited source could cobble together a list of 100 notable metal singers is impressive, but does not really indicate that all of the 100 were of high or even fair quality.

As it stands the reference looks like an attempt by Stapp's agent to create a false impression of high critical regard in people with poor reading comprehension and math skill. While the information is strictly correct, I'd suggest it runs afoul of NPOV since people favorable to Stapp will see it as praise and people unfavorable to him will see it as a subtle insult.

98.225.182.131 (talk) 22:28, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is not a forum. Your opinions don't belong here. It's a properly cited source.--98.209.42.117 (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scott Stapp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Scott Stapp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

I recently added the Art of Anarchy-related lawsuit (2018) to the Legal Troubles section but today realized it was already mentioned under Art of Anarchy: 2016 - Present. Should it be under both sections? One section? Which one? I look forward to improving my contributions to Wikipedia. Dogscatsbirds (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Urinating incident

[edit]

No mention of his public urination at a publicist's dinner? This was reported on NPR, I believe, and also on another national talk-radio show.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6080:21F0:6140:5D8:54E5:408B:60EC (talk) 13:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

The usage of "[sic]" within the paragraph under Legal Troubles beginning "In 2015..." is incorrect, as the spelling and usage of the phrase "...a big sigh..." are both correct. 2601:CD:4000:610:9C28:4627:69E5:8532 (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

e

Factual corrections for the "Legal and personal troubles" section

[edit]

I am reaching out as a paid representative for Scott Stapp (WP:PAID). I am disclosing my conflict of interest as required by policy, but I am keeping my agency affiliation private for professional reasons. My goal is to ensure the article accurately reflects its cited sources while maintaining the strict neutrality and privacy required by WP:BLP (Biographies of Living Persons). The "Legal and personal troubles" section currently contains several inaccuracies regarding legal outcomes and medical framing. I have formatted these as "Change X to Y" requests to satisfy the required template.

1. Removal of medical delusions as credible facts

• Current Text: "...Stapp had claimed that he was a CIA agent tasked with killing President Barack Obama. On November 13, Stapp's wife called 911 to report that he had claimed he was a CIA agent and that ISIS was targeting his children's school."

• Requested Change: REMOVE COMPLETELY.

• Reasoning: These specific keywords are identified in the cited source [75] as "hallucinations" and "delusional thinking" during a medically diagnosed psychotic break. Including them as standalone claims without immediate medical context violates WP:BLP by presenting symptoms of a mental health crisis as if they were credible actions or threats. Per WP:EXCEPTIONAL, claims of this nature require multiple high-quality independent sources; a single report of a medical hallucination does not meet this bar for a living person's biography.

2. Legal classification of the 2007 incident

• Current Text: "...charged with felony assault..."

• Requested Change: "...charged with assault (later reduced to a misdemeanor)..."

• Reasoning: Per WP:BLPSETTLE, the article must reflect the final legal outcome rather than initial charges. Palm Beach County judicial records and source [68] confirm the final charge was a misdemeanor.

3. Clarification of the 2003 narrative

• Current Text: "In 2003, Stapp reportedly attempted suicide after he became convinced that anyone involved with Creed wanted him dead... He eventually backed down when he saw a photo of his son."

• Requested Change: "In 2003, reports emerged regarding a potential suicide attempt; however, Stapp later clarified in an interview with Spin that the event was mischaracterized and described it as 'just a thought' rather than an attempt."

• Reasoning: To maintain a neutral point of view and accuracy per WP:V, the subject's direct rebuttal in source [10] must be included to provide a complete and fair account.

I appreciate the assistance of any volunteer in bringing this biography into alignment with Wikipedia’s standards for accuracy and neutrality. Contextmatterss (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not done: @Contextmatterss: Do not write comments with AI. Never. Not ever. I've changed the tense from Stapp claimed to Stapp had claimed since that did need clarifying. lp0 on fire () 08:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for both clarifications. I am new to this and appreciate your insight. ~2026-33824-29 (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

I tried clicking on a reference link under section Acting but the link did not work. I also clicked on a reference link under section Art of Anarchy 2016 - 2018, it also did not work. What is the best way to fix this? Dogscatsbirds (talk) 17:13, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI follow-up

[edit]
lp0 on fire () 10:21, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

@Lp0 on fire thank you for the clarification! Below is my original version. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help this process move along. I appreciate your time in looking this over and helping me to make the correct edit requests.

1. Suicide Attempt

Right now it says: He later said that instead of killing himself, he fired a few rounds in his home. He said, "I was in the throes of prednisone coming out of my body [...] I shot a few rounds off and instantly was like, 'What the hell am I doing?' So I put the guns away and ran out to the garage and got the putty and patched the holes. (63 Citation)

Change it to:

"Addressing a 2003 incident in a 2009 interview with Spin, Stapp clarified that reports of a suicide attempt were mischaracterized, stating, 'It was just a thought. But when I did an interview and shared the story of that moment, it got blown into something bigger. But I was at a low point. Thank God I didn’t act on it.' He confirmed that he had discharged a firearm in his home while experiencing severe side effects from prednisone, stating, 'I shot a few rounds off and instantly was like, 'What the hell am I doing?' So I put the guns away and ran out to the garage and got the putty and patched the holes."

Why: The text cites the 2009 Spin Magazine interview, but the quote is wrong. Scott didn't actually say that entire block of text. The first half ("He later said that instead of killing himself, he fired a few rounds in his home") was actually a question asked by the interviewer, John Sellers. Scott just responded to it. He also mentions in the same interview when asked about his suicide attempt: “That was mischaracterized a bit. It was just a thought. But when I did an interview and shared the story of that moment, it got blown into something bigger. But I was at a low point. Thank God I didn’t act on it.” .https://www.spinmagazine.com/2009/11/tough-questions-scott-stapp/

2. Payout Clarification

Right now it says: “In March 2006, Stapp filed a lawsuit to block the release of a sex video involving himself, Kid Rock, and four women.The suit was settled in 2007, with the defendant agreeing to pay Stapp an undisclosed sum and to refrain from distributing the video.”

Change it to:

"In March 2006, Stapp filed a lawsuit to block the commercial distribution of an unauthorized private video recorded in 1999. The lawsuit was settled in late 2007, with the distributor agreeing to a permanent injunction to halt all distribution and promotion of the video. Stapp's attorney confirmed that Stapp received no financial payment from the settlement, as his sole objective was to permanently protect his privacy."

Why:The current text misrepresents the nature of the lawsuit, the legal context, and the financial outcome. It leaves out a key fact reported in Billboard's original 2006 coverage: the tape was unauthorized and had been stolen from Stapp's private property. It also states that the defendant agreed to "pay Stapp an undisclosed sum," but that is not what the cited 2007 Billboard source says. According to the article, the financial settlement was between the tape's distributor and a separate media group, not Stapp himself. In fact, the article includes a statement from Stapp's attorney specifically clarifying that Stapp did not receive any money from the settlement. As written this entry gives readers a misleading impression of both the lawsuit and its outcome by suggesting Stapp financially benefited from the distribution of stolen private material, even though the cited source explicitly says otherwise. Because of the inaccuracy, if possible, I would like this taken out completely or changed to what I requested above.

3. 2006 Addiction Context

Right now it says: “In a 2006 Rolling Stone interview, Stapp acknowledged that he had become addicted to Percocet, Xanax, and was withdrawing from prednisone for vocal cord inflammation during Creed's tour in support of Weathered.” (Citation 73).

Change it to:

"Reflecting on the height of Creed's success in a 2006 interview with Rolling Stone, Stapp explained that during the band's Weathered tour, he had been prescribed heavy doses of prednisone to treat acute vocal cord inflammation. The severe physical crash and psychological withdrawal from the steroid treatment subsequently led to a dependency on prescribed Percocet and Xanax."

Why: In the 2006 Rolling Stone interview and other biographical accounts, Stapp clarified that during the Weathered tour, he was prescribed massive, toxic doses of prednisone solely to treat severe vocal cord inflammation so the band wouldn't have to cancel stadium dates. The dependency on Percocet and Xanax developed after the tour as a direct result of coping with the severe physical crash and psychological withdrawal from the prednisone. So those two drugs should be talked about as a precription, not like a street drug addiction. Also, because The Daily Beast is an aggregator site that often summarizes other older articles, it is a weak source for biographical pages, so if possible, I’d like to see this removed completely. https://www.thedailybeast.com/creed-singer-scott-stapps-fall-from-grace-from-40-million-albums-sold-to-living-in-a-holiday-inn/

4. 2007 Domestic Fight

Right now it says: “On May 20, 2007, Stapp was charged with one count of felony assault stemming from a domestic violence incident. Stapp was later set free on supervised release. Stapp apologized to his wife and the public on May 23, 2007, and the charge was later dropped.”

Change it to:

"On May 20, 2007, Stapp was arrested following a domestic dispute at his home. While initially booked on a felony count, the presiding judge reduced the charge to misdemeanor assault during his initial court appearance after determining the facts were weak. Stapp was released on supervised release, and the misdemeanor charge was subsequently dropped."

Why: The source explicitly states that at his initial court appearance, Judge Cory J. Ciklin looked at the weak facts and reduced the charge to a misdemeanor assault after determining the item thrown (an Orangina bottle) was not a deadly weapon. https://web.archive.org/web/20080319224648/http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1159179,00.html

5. Bipolar Disorder

Right now it says: “In 2015, Stapp told People he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder following a psychotic break, where he drove across the United States, allegedly following an angel on the hood of his car. He had claimed ISIS targeting his children's school, millions of dollars had been stolen from his bank account, and that he was a CIA agent, tasked with killing the then-US president, Barack Obama. He commented that the diagnosis was "a big sign [sic] of relief, because finally, we had an answer" about the reasons for his mental health difficulties. In the same interview, Stapp indicated that he was sober and working through a 12-step program. (Citation 75 & 76)”

Change it to:

"In 2015, Stapp disclosed to People that he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder following a 2014 psychotic break. He clarified that the severe delusions and hallucinations he experienced during the episode were the result of the undiagnosed condition interacting with alcohol and prescription drug use. Stapp noted that finally receiving the proper medical diagnosis brought 'a big sigh of relief, because finally, we had an answer' regarding his mental health difficulties. In the same interview, he confirmed he was sober, managing his condition with medication, and working through a 12-step program."

Why: The current text includes a direct transcription typo and relies on sensationalized, fragmented details from 911 dispatch calls instead of the reflective statements Stapp made in the cited People articles. Those sources focus on the medical reality of the incident, explaining that the hallucinations were caused by a severe, previously undiagnosed mental health condition interacting with substance abuse. The proposed revision corrects the transcription error, removes the unnecessarily wording, and more accurately reflects the cited sources by presenting the event as a health crisis that led to a definitive diagnosis, ongoing treatment, and long-term sobriety. Contextmatterss (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This looks much better! I might not have time to review it for a few days, but feel free to post it as a new edit request on the talk page in case someone else wants to respond first. lp0 on fire () 16:21, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Lp0 on fire Amazing! I can wait for your help. Thank you again for being attentive and quick with your responses. Contextmatterss (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
If I haven't got round to this in the next week or so, feel free to ping me again because there's a chance I might have forgotten. lp0 on fire () 17:49, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Lp0 on fire Hi! Just wanted to check in to see if you have time to look over these change requests. Thank you! Contextmatterss (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the ping. Unfortunately I forgot and I now don't have a computer with me but I'll see what I can do on my terrible mobile. Sorry for making you wait so long. lp0 on fire () 18:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I removed the Daily Beast section. I might need a laptop to look into the rest but I suspect I'll end up removing most of it. lp0 on fire () 16:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Lp0 on fire no worries, everyone has a life lol! Thank you for being so attentive, I appreciate it.Contextmatterss (talk) Contextmatterss (talk) 19:51, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Lp0 on fire, hope all is well. I wanted to see if there is anything else you may need from me, any clarification, or more sources. Thank you! Contextmatterss (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I haven't really been that active recently. I removed another section because we really don't need to document every time a famous person gets in a fight. I'm hoping to look into the rest soon, but feel free to put {{edit coi}} at the top of this thread so that there's the chance of someone else getting to it first. lp0 on fire () 17:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply