Talk:Science Policy Research Unit

The citations are placed in strange places (in headlines) because the page is being deleted without them.

Headings are still not the correct place for citations, so I moved them to the end of each section. Also, please note that all of the citations are to a single source - the SPRU website. While that source may be ok to support basic facts, That is not a reliable source to demonstrate notability per WP:N or WP:GNG. You need to cite significant coverage in sources independent of the subject. – ukexpat (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I have added two new references (2 and 5) from independent sources, which I think shows the notability of SPRU. DO you think we can drop the 'notability' issue? I will also go on editing the entry to reflect SPRU's current structure and focus, relying, whenever possible, on sources other than SPRU website. Caepenna (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Why does Research Policy redirect here? Eigenbra (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 17 February 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Also, this appears to have been a cut and paste move in the past, so the history at the redirect will be restored. Number 57 12:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

---

Science and Technology Policy Research → Science Policy Research Unit – Science and Technology Policy Research have reverted to its old name Science Policy Research Unit in 2014. See link here: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/25294 and announcement from official SPRU Twitter account: https://twitter.com/spru/status/481105299135533056 . We would like to change Wikipedia article to the current name "Science Policy Research Unit" Noraresearchsupport (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge proposal: Harvard Sussex Program to here

Harvard Sussex Program doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY, but could be a useful section here. Harvard Sussex Program has been tagged for notability for 7 years. Boleyn (talk) 06:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)