Talk:School Mathematics Project

Untitled

SMP maths books were (in the early 80s) far ahead of the game. For example, they covered topology at age 11, something that other syllabi leave for the university math courses to introduce. I took the O-level, Additional Math, A-level, S-level and Further Maths courses. It was tremendous fun. It was somewhat amusing later on, turning up at university and already having seen matrices, topology, and other stuff that the other students were seeing for the first time. They had to grapple with the new concepts while I could go straight on to use them in the physics context. In fact, just about the only thing I found new at university were tensors, and I cannot recall if that is because the SMP Futher Math books didn't cover them or because I skipped that part of the course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.219.56.50 (talk) 23:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Edit to remove opinion and bias.

Substantial edits made back in Sept 2012 contained WP:Opinion,WP:Weasel, non-WP:Neutral, and lacked WP:RS. Two paragraphs - a substantial bulk of the article. I've removed them, and should the author wish to restore them, I suggest he bring it here first so we can talk about it. Plutonium27 (talk) 13:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Rationale summary missing; also implications

This article describes the “what” of SMP, but not the “why” ie the rationale for its introduction. Also the implications for students having to switch between the two schemes as they moved between schools, is not covered (something I have personal experience of). Making major curriculum changes such as this, has relevance to current day and ongoing This is worthy of mention. 109.147.160.193 (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)