Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21dacf15b5b6102

Jump to content

Talk:Scatterometer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Hurricane Noah in topic Split radar

Expanding

[edit]

Perhaps some expansion can be made from http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~bourassa/scat_html/What_is_Scat.shtml ? --AySz88^-^ 04:04, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Terminology; reversed meaning?

[edit]

§ Optical says

Lateral scattering by the air along the light beam is quantified as an attenuation coefficient. Any departure from the clear air extinction coefficient (e.g. in fog) is measured and is proportional to the visibility.


  1. What's the difference, if any, between attenuation coefficient and extinction coefficient?
  2. The wording of the second sentence means that the greater the departure from clear air, the greater the extinction coefficient, which increases in proportion to visibility. In other words, the less clear the air is, the better the visibility. That sure looks backwards: it should probably say "inversely proportional".

--Thnidu (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Extinction coefficient and attenuation coefficient are the same in meteorology. You are right about the wording, I changed it to be clearer. Pierre cb (talk) 12:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Split radar

[edit]

it's a notable concept. fgnievinski (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oppose That would leave this already small article with even less than it already has. NoahTalk 09:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply