Talk:Sauropodomorpha

Isanosaurus and Antetonitrus: the first Triassic sauropods discovered

The descriptions of Isanosaurus in 2000 and Antetonitrus in 2003 confirm that sauropods diverged from Thecodontosaurus along with the prosauropods. This shows that sauropods and prosauropods evolved from a common ancestor.

Sauropodiformes

On I found Sauropodiformes as a group of sauropodomorphs that included all but the Guaibasauridae. It was said that it was named by Martinez et al. in 2011. Is this true and if so should it be included in the article? Reid,iain james (talk) 00:32, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

The clade diagrams are inconsistent with those on dinosaur pages

And I cannot find some dinosaur clades in the clade diagrams on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.243.199.239 (talk) 07:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Any in particular? They may be nested within sub-clades like Anchisauria which are not expanded here due to space restrictions. Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sauropodomorpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050115161940/http://www.palaeos.com/vertebrates/Units/Unit330/330.000.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/Unit330/330.000.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Merge Proposal for Plateosauria

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was unanimous support for the merge. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 02:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

---

Support: Merge was suggested a few months ago at WT:DINO in order to streamline the cladistic layout of Wikipedia articles. Plateosauria is a stub, and a node-based clade with little potential to expand the article. The merge was proposed and discussed as part of a larger set of merge proposals, so this proposal is a matter of procedure. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

• Support LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 20:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

suppory AFH (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support from me as well. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 02:10, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Support SilverTiger12 (talk) 22:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.