Talk:Satank Bridge
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 7 months ago by HurricaneZeta in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Satank Bridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Satank Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- ... that Satank Bridge (pictured) to Satank, Colorado, was constructed in 1900 for $2,325, while its 2011 restoration was estimated to cost at least $750,000?
- Source: "Renovation Complete of 111-Year Old Satank Bridge". garfieldcountyco.gov. Garfield County, Colorado. May 12, 2011. Retrieved October 29, 2025.
Created by Pbritti (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 4. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 85 past nominations.
Pbritti (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2025 (UTC).
Hi Pbritti, review follows: article moved to mainspace on 27 October and nominated within 7 days; article exceeds minimum length and is well-enough written; article is cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources; I didn't pick up on any overly-close paraphrasing from a spot check on the sources; hook fact is interesting enough for me (even accounting for inflation the values are markedly different), though perhaps also consider alternatives eg. that the settlement has had four names; the proposed hook fact checks out to sources cited. A handful of minor issues - Dumelow (talk) 07:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
The links you bolded are the same article, I would lose the bridge one since the article is at Satank, ColoradoThe image used must be in the article linked, this one isn'tThe cost stated here and in the source is $750,000, in the article you have $750,500- To comply with DYK rules you need to have a citation immediately after the two sentences with the costs in
- You need to provide QPQs
- @Dumelow: I've complete two of the four required QPQs and I appreciate your patience on that. I am a bit confused by
The links you bolded are the same article
. One article is about the bridge on the National Register of Historic Places, the other is on the unincorporated community. I have corrected the figure on expense. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must have clicked the same link twice and assumed one was a redirect to the town article! I will review the Satank Bridge article soon. I would suggest you link this article from Satank, Colorado and consider using a {{main}} header in the "Satank Bridge" section of that article - Dumelow (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely no worries. Good idea with the Template:Main. Working on the last two QPQs momentarily. Thanks for your patience and review! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:02, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Satank Bridge is also fine and meets all criteria. Let me know when you have completed the last two QPQs - Dumelow (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Ah, you already did! Good to go - Dumelow (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Satank Bridge is also fine and meets all criteria. Let me know when you have completed the last two QPQs - Dumelow (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely no worries. Good idea with the Template:Main. Working on the last two QPQs momentarily. Thanks for your patience and review! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:02, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must have clicked the same link twice and assumed one was a redirect to the town article! I will review the Satank Bridge article soon. I would suggest you link this article from Satank, Colorado and consider using a {{main}} header in the "Satank Bridge" section of that article - Dumelow (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Colorado articles
- Low-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
