Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25fbba0fdcf36cd

Jump to content

Talk:Satanic nightjar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 8.227.192.58 in topic Conservation rating.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 13:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the call of the Satanic nightjar has been likened to it pulling out a person's eye? Source top of p. 22
  • ALT1 ... that the call of the Satanic nightjar has been likened to a person having his eye pulled out?

5x expanded by Claire Paillard 46 (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 11:50, 17 October 2019 (UTC).Reply

  • This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and I have added ALT1, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. For Halloween? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Firstly, the hook is not accurate because the source says it's like the sound of the bird "taking someone's eye out", not the sound of the person having his eye pulled out. Secondly, the article says this may be a misattributed bird call, and I can't see any reason why we should run a hook that may be erroneous, so I think a new hook will be required. Gatoclass (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

What does it visually look like?

[edit]

Aren't there any pics, photos, or drawings of the bird that could be used?

Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conservation rating.

[edit]

In the early table part its listed as leaste concern. Laster in the conservation text its vunerable. Which is it? 8.227.192.58 (talk) 02:32, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply