Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2557e602dc2f485

Jump to content

Talk:Sapa Inca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Danial Bass in topic Ref probably needs a fix

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 25 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Samuel Vigneault.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

[edit]

I think this article seriously needs to be worked on. For example, the article starts by quoting the theory of multiple, concurrent Inca emperors. This theory is not universally accepted. -- toivotuo 08:19, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Who doesn't accept it? Maybe we can site this critic? The page needs more content as well, as do most of the Supa Inca's pages... maybe you could work on em? Zenyu 14:18, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
It's more like: Who DOES accept it? The primary sources, such as Fr. Cobo and Poma de Ayala's accounts, are in fairly strong agreement that there was a monarchy rather than a diarchy. The only major scholar in favor of a diarchy is Zuidema. Moseley, too, favors a non-monarchic model, though one differing from Zuidema's. Mainstream academic opinion is in favor of the primary documents. Historian Brundage and the archaeologist D'Altroy are notable specialists in favor of the monarchic model. It is worth, I think, mentioning the academic debate, but certainly not portraying the moietal diarchy as the model of Inka government. D.E. Cottrell (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Titu Cusi Yupanqui.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Titu Cusi Yupanqui.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 11 October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Truth

[edit]

It’s Saba Inca and only the American Indian(Aboriginals, the copper colored race wear our nation’s title. Mexicans are not us and no other nation. We were already here when all invaders came. And it’s a disgrace to attach African to our title Americans. We honor who we are, can’t say the same for you all. But the day of reckoning is on the way. You all are the abomination that will cause the earth to be desolate. And you will be no more when we come back. 2601:249:4001:8DD0:1C32:E701:4EEA:9607 (talk) 22:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ref probably needs a fix

[edit]

The ref looks like its attached to the Sapa Inca template Danial Bass (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply