Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28ad2846f81addf

Jump to content

Talk:Sanitation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 November 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Monica Tadros.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Made some edits to the section on "health aspects"

[edit]

I've just made some edits to the section on "health aspects" by using the publication by WHO on "Guidelines on Sanitation and Health". More work is needed though as the section on health aspects is currently a bit messy and repetitive.EMsmile (talk) 02:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've shortened this further and moved content to the sub-article. EMsmile (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Economic aspects

[edit]

Economic aspects (benefits) are not discussed much in the article currently compared to public health and environmental aspects. Will it be a good idea to club them all together under one heading? Sparsh85 (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

There is a small section on economic aspects (which could be built up). Or maybe it should be moved into the heading of "Costs"? Costs is a standard heading that we use... Speaking of standard headings and standard ordering: this is important and we have an outline here in the Manual of Style. I would not deviate too much from that but attempt to stick to those standard headings to make it easier for readers to orientate themselves. EMsmile (talk) 02:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
There are two aspects to economics here - One, the costs of putting the system in place and two, the economic impact of having or not having a system in place. The latter is similar to health impacts due to managed or unmanaged waste. I have made additions based on a WSP study for India and another study based on census numbers. I have also edited the sub-heading slightly, the level can be decided when we have more content there.Sparsh85 (talk) 13:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Have used the excerpt template

[edit]

I have now added the excerpt template for the section where we give an overview about different types of sanitation. It basically takes the first paragraph of the lead from the sub-article. This way, if the sub-article is updated then it's updated here as well. Very practical and efficient. EMsmile (talk) 12:23, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

About Community-led total sanitation

[edit]

I think CLTS is a method of planning and not type of sanitation system like OSS or CBS. What do you think EMsmile. Please also mark other people who are actively editing sanitation related articles. Thanks Sparsh85 (talk) 13:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's true, thanks for pointing that out. I'll think of a way to modify the text to make it clearer.EMsmile (talk) 02:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
I've changed the headings now, please check. What do you think about this change? EMsmile (talk) 02:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Added information about climate change

[edit]

I have added some more information about climate change and sanitation. There are two aspects: how extreme weather events due to climate change impact sanitation infrastructure, and how sanitation systems emit greenhouse gases. Please help further with this new content if you have publications at your finger tips. I still need to select some good publications about the methane emissions from septic tanks (this ought to also be added to septic tanks). A quick Google search brought up many results, still need to decide which ones to use: https://www.google.com/search?q=methane+emissions+from+septic+tanks&rlz=1C1SQJL_enAU903AU903&oq=methane+emissions+from+septic+tanks&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i22i29i30.3983j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Please help if this is your area of interest. I also need to work this information (with references) which a colleague sent to me into the relevant articles: "I would suggest that most of the sanitation-contributed methane is produced by anaerobic systems such as septic tanks and borda dewats. Modern anaerobic treatment plants use the methane but onsite systems do not. If these last-century systems were replaced with aerobic treatment systems such as vermifiltration this would achieve far greater mitigation than container-based sanitation. I'll also point out that the Wikipedia articles "Onsite sewage facility" and "Decentralized wastewater system" (which really should be one article) do not mention this fundamental difference between systems." EMsmile (talk) 01:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

New section on safely managed sanitation

[edit]

Thanks for adding the new section on safely managed sanitation, User:Waternote. However, would we be able to change a little bit from UN speech to something that is easier to understand for lay persons? I know it's hard because we are quoting definitions but still... For example, it is not clear to me what this means: "The operation definition of indicator 6.2.1a is the following". And would it help to quote any of the current data? I have now moved a sentence that was further down below in in the SDG section to the new section. I feel that we have a bit of overlap with SDG 6 now, so we have to be careful. EMsmile (talk) 14:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've worked on this section a bit now to make it easier to understand. (pinging User:Waternote). EMsmile (talk) 11:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, it reads well. Waternote (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026

[edit]

The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.

If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:

  1. Add yourself as a participant
  2. Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
  3. Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
  4. Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection

To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply