Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2250b2b9fddcf75

Jump to content

Talk:Samurai Gun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Noosentaal in topic Inappropriate tone in Plot section

Untitled

[edit]

This needs a lot of work from someone who is into anime. --Reyk 02:31, 23 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

This isn't a Wikipedia article. It's a review. --Postbagboy 22:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Removed NPOV blurb, added some data, needs lots of info. --Ariliand 01:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Plot

[edit]

Removed the plot per WP:CP as it was copied entirely from the ANN article. Can someone who viewed this write a new one? Ninja neko 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Red Steel connection?

[edit]

No clue if it could possibly be worth mentioning but the third last page (#22) of the Red Steel (Wii game) manual (Europe) is a ad for Samurai Gun. It reads:


More swords. More guns. More blood.

Learn from the best - Watch the Samurai Guns deliver justice in shogun japan!

From ADV films - Volume 2 out now!


Just mentioning it since Red Steel has a sword'n'gun weilding protagonist and the way it is phrased makes it sound as if it is not SIMPLY an ad but that there might be a connection. 217.210.20.20 (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

An advertisement of the game is non-notable, there's probobly many advertisements for Samurai Gun in many other places. – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 01:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate tone in Plot section

[edit]

I feel that the plot section of this article reads more like the blurb on the back of a book or DVD than an encyclopedia article. Please could somebody familiar with the subject matter re-write the section. I'll be happy to copyedit any changes that are made. Thank you - Noosentaal(talk) 14:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply