Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2432cc8dc311ae0

Jump to content

Talk:Samford University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 184.153.21.19 in topic Questioning revert

Notable Alumni Cumberland Law

[edit]

Rania Majors 35 years of representing any, and everyone in Philadelphia committed activist, and community leader. She is on the ballot to become a judge, and join the ranks of your prestigious University. 2601:41:4301:46E0:34FE:EB81:176:D913 (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Questioning revert

[edit]

This revert did not provide an appropriate edit summary or rationale. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samford_University&diff=prev&oldid=1265765355

The edit summary was "unnecessary." However - nothing on wp is necessary. Not event the article.

It was an appropriate change that was reverted, however. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

It is unnecessary to have a long list on article A, when a more inclusive list on the same topic can be found on article B. Just direct readers on article A wishing to read the list...to article B. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello and the best of holidays to you. I'm not sure you happened to notice my above note on the use of the word "unnecessary" here. I hope you are enjoying the holiday season. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Magnolia677 that a comprehensive and detailed listing that duplicates an existing category or list article is not necessary in this article. It's much more helpful to provide a summary of the existing category or list article and a link. ElKevbo (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. That's of course interesting. Please point me to a wp rule that states that anything on wikipedia is necessary. You as well seem not to be referring to the point that I've made twice above. I recognize that the two of you are experts. Happy holidays. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply