Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24513705a1898f1

Jump to content

Talk:Sambuvarayar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Rosguill in topic Vanniyar/Palli origin identification

Sambuvarayar Dynasty

Vanniyar and Palli

[edit]

Please don not push your opinion that the ancient term vanniyar (meaning warrior/chieftain) is synonymous with the modern usage for the Vanniyar/Palli caste. That is merely an origin myth propagated by vain members of that caste since the 19th century and, despite assertions that were once in various articles, Noboru Karashima has been explicit in saying it is dodgy to connect the two. - Sitush (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

See, for example, here. - Sitush (talk) 07:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Have u read Noboru Karashima's South Indian Society in Transition??He clearly says that the sambuvarayas belong to the "Palli" Jati in that book.How did you arrive to the conclusion that its an origin myth?.Your example doesn't even mention about sambuvarayas.Do you even know tamil?

Read Noboru Karashima's work or do a research and prove him otherwise.Modern usage??since when?Have you gone through at least the copper plate grants released by the palli people??

Sambuvarayas and Palli Jati

[edit]

Noboru Karashima in his book Ancient to Medieval:South Indian Society in Transition has stated on Page Number 143 and I quote,'Ammaiyappan Pandyan Naralokavirapperaiyan of Sengeni,who may be identified with Rajendrachola Sambuvarayan apperaring in the next Siyamangalam inscription,is stated to be a Kudipalli of Munnuru in Vijayarajendra-valanadu.and the term Kudipalli would show that he belonged to a group of landholding (Kudi) Pallis '

Sitush have you even seen that book????

Page vandalisation

[edit]

This page is repeatedly being vandalised by a user named Rajadhirajan. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 16:26, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Page vandalisation

[edit]

Hi, change protection settings for Sambuvarayar [Edit=Allow only administrators] . All castes have written books claiming rights to ancient kings. Do not include them in the article. The information is not complete in the books - most of the information is the authors' own words and poor sources. Caste pride content should also be prevented from occurring.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajadhirajan (talkcontribs) 18:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have quoted from books by eminent historians - Noboru Karashima and MS Govindasamy - your actions seem to have a hidden agenda. Moderators please look into this guy. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Vanniyar/Palli origin identification

[edit]

Noting that a non-WP:XC editor raised concerns about the claim The Sambuvarayas belonged to the Vanniyar community, I investigated the supporting citations: Govindasamy, M.S (1979). The Role of Feudatories in Later Chola History, epigraphia indica, and Noboru 2009. It seems that Noboru 2009 supports the claim, stating In the thirteenth century [the Pallis] established their power as chiefly families in the North Arcot, South Arcot, and Chingleput districts, like the Kadavarayas and the Sambuvarayas.” I would note, however, that the Epigraphia Indica v.28 appears to be a WP:RAJ source originally published in the 1920s (I had some trouble navigating the scan and did not check if it confirms the claim beyond noting this issue with its underlying reliability), and I am unable to find any digital copies of Govindasamy 1979 (although citations in other accessible texts do at least appear to confirm that it is a real source). signed, Rosguill talk 16:57, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply