Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245f74bd842f49c

Jump to content

Talk:Sam Wasson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Turktimex3 in topic January 2023

January 2023

[edit]

Hello Turktimex3. I assure you that my edits are not vandalism, please stop making such unfounded accusations. The reasons for my changes are identified in each of the edit summaries. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

it is texbook vandalism, when you remove reliable sourced information. what possible consensus reason could you have for removing NYTimes and Guardian book review references? you need to demonstrate that you will comply with policy, not vindictively right all great COI wrongs. --Turktimex3 (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please learn what vandalism means on Wikipedia, before you make these serious accusations. Have you looked through the Edit Summaries? The reasons for the changes are stated there. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
"Removing encyclopedic content without any reason, or replacing such content with nonsense." Wikipedia:Vandalism. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
That is part of the explanation (and please note the "without any reason" wording), however the key point is at the top. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
provide a reason to remove a NYTimes book review, if you have any.--Turktimex3 (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply