Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter ยท presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf ยท coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2373c8e6f21a8fe

Jump to content

Talk:Sam Kee Building/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Actuall7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) ยท Article talk (edit | history) ยท Watch

Nominator: Yue (talk ยท contribs) 07:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Actuall7 (talk ยท contribs) 08:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I would like to review this article. Creating the page first. Actuall7 (talk) 08:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Actuall7: I have made these edits based on your feedback. I have also responded to each of your points. Please take a look and let me know what else you'd like to see. Cheers. Yue๐ŸŒ™ 03:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey @Yue, great work addressing everything so far. Upon checking the image again, I think it is slightly longer than the building, so it should be fine to leave the sentence. Additionally, should it be changed to specify wider than the first floor, not the building? I doubt anyone will be confused by it, so you can leave it if you want. Actuall7 (talk) 04:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Actuall7: Maybe "... wider than the building (excluding the bay windows)."? Yue๐ŸŒ™ 05:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure. One last thing, the expropriate without compensation linked in the lead should be linked in the Background and prelude section. After that, I think that it's ready to pass. Actuall7 (talk) 05:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Actuall7:  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™ 06:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good work on the article, passing it now. Actuall7 (talk) 06:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

initial checks

[edit]
  • Earwig and authorship is fine.
  • File:Sam Kee Building, 23 May 2024.jpg checkY
  • File:Sam Kee Building side view, 16 May 2024.jpg checkY
  • File:Sam Kee Building lot before and after.png checkY
  • File:Sam Kee Building, Pender Street at Carrall (Dec. 1937).jpg checkY
  • File:Skinny Building, 2015-03-10.jpg checkY
  • Minor issue, but I think the 2015 is a typo. The file information and metadata states it was taken on 10 March 2014, not 2015. โ€“ Fixed. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Lead

[edit]
  • British Columbia, Canada, and Pennsylvania should not be linked per MOS:OVERLINK. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • The reference used in the infobox to cite the alternative name Jack Chow Building calls it the Jack Chow Insurance Building. โ€“ Fixed. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Chang bet a business associate that he could construct a building on the land that remained, and the Sam Kee Building was completed a year later. The comma should be removed. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Architecture

[edit]
  • Is it possible to find the length of the sign? The source doesn't state its length and it isn't quite clear in the picture whether it really is wider than the building. โ€“ I couldn't find a measurement online or in the city archives. Do you want to take the source's word for it or remove that sentence? Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Spite house and Vancouver City Council should be linked. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • In 1998, when the fee for the windows was waived by Vancouver City Council, the fees were CA$260 for the windows and CA$2,500 for the basement. It doesn't really make sense to include the basement fee in this sentence, given that it is talking about the waiving of the window fees. โ€“ Expanded the sentence into a paragraph. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Background and prelude

[edit]
  • established a branch in Vancouver in 1907, with the goal of expelling Asians from the city. Remove comma. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Consider changing Asiatic Exclusion League to Vancouver Asiatic Exclusion League to follow the source and linking to Asiatic Exclusion League#Canada. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • successfully petitioned Vancouver City Council change to successfully petitioned to the Vancouver City Council โ€“ Adjusted. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • in order to render Chinese-owned properties unsuitable for commercial use Specify that it was properties along Pender Street. Also, shouldn't it be Chinese-owned lots, given that properties weren't built there yet? โ€“ Fixed. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Not sure if Chang Toy was "influential". The sources used in that sentence don't really call him "influential", but "well-known". โ€“ Removed. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • running a large-scale import-export business that involved members of the Anglo-European business establishment It might just be me, but I find this sentence hard to understand, do you think you could reword it slightly? โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Construction and early years

[edit]
  • The basement contained a public baths. Fix typo. โ€“ Fixed. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Consider including that Kennerly Bryan and William C. F. Gillam were Bryan & Gillam, given that you include the name of the firm in the infobox. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Acquisition by Jack Chow

[edit]
  • Consider adding the cost of the renovation as stated in Ref 7. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Current use

[edit]
  • I might have missed it, but which part of Ref 4 states that Rod gives tours of the building? โ€“ I probably forgot to put the proper citation there. I know for a fact that he gives tours because I went on one this year, but I can't find the source right now so I'll leave it out. Yue๐ŸŒ™

Recognition

[edit]

See also

[edit]
  • I think the see also section should be more similar to the Skinny Building's, which includes the links to its rival and spite house. โ€“ I did not include a link to either because of WP:NOTSEEALSO: "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." Yue๐ŸŒ™

References

[edit]
  • You should link the names of newspapers in the reflist, seeing how some are linked and others and not. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Add the source date for [9]. โ€“  Done. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • Is [3] and [5] reliable in this sentence: which were characteristic of many buildings in Chinatown at the time of its construction, in 1913? [5] states that it has bay windows whilst [3] states that it is characteristic. [3] is seemingly by an agency under the government so I'm not sure if that proves that it was characteristic. Does this source[1] better explain why the bay windows were characteristic? โ€“ Adjective changed to "common" + more context added from source provided by reviewer. Yue๐ŸŒ™
  • The rest of the sources are fine.

References

  1. โ†‘ Lai, David Chuenyan (November 2011). Chinatowns: Towns within Cities in Canada. UBC Press. p. 69. ISBN 9780774844185. Retrieved 22 December 2024.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.