Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22dd4632e1afa14

Jump to content

Talk:Sam Hallam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 141.241.26.21 in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

There are two views you can take of this: (a) At face value it seems incredible that (i) so weak a case reached court at all, (ii) that the judge did not instruct the jury to acquit, (iii) that the conviction was not overturned at the first appeal and (iv) that the prosecution sat on their hands until the day of the second appeal (by which time Hallam's phone had been examined, showing that he had been nowhere near the scene of the crime) before admitting that there was any problem with their case. If this astonishing picture is accurate, what confidence can anyone have in British justice? And now this is out in the open, why are heads not rolling? (b) The whole story is not being told - in which case a more detailed view of the original prosecution case needs to be presented. Everything here at the moment reflects the post-acquittal spin. 141.241.26.21 (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply