Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ed9b5dfc31ec6

Jump to content

Talk:Sailor Moon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Chipmunkdavis in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleSailor Moon was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
August 4, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 25, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 18, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 13, 2009Good article reassessmentListed
September 29, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 16, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
May 19, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2022 and 4 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AnnabethChase204 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Sethclaymon, Elissaking.

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Procedurally closed CMD (talk) 16:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since the previous assessment and delisting of this article, I have seemingly noticed that the community has made great strides in performing whatever cleanup and corrections needed to meet the criteria for GA. At the time of this article's delisting in 2013, I had noticed the article had been subjected to much fancruft in text and citations, such as referencing only blogs and/or fansites, which contained zero encyclopedia-appropriate material and original research. In today's observation, the fancruft all but does not exist (if not, at a miniscule level), and the references are only news sources without linking to fansites and/or original research. I might not fully understand if this was the reason for the 2013 delisting, but I would like to leave this reevaluation to the community to decide.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 05:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

My apologies. I was unaware.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 05:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply