Talk:Sacagawea
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sacagawea article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| Sacagawea was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change 'attribiute' to 'attribute' and change 'co-captain's' to 'co-captains Kbf.0405 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Partly done: I fixed the spelling on "attribute", but "co-captain's" with an apostrophe does make grammatical sense to me, so I've left that as-is. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 22:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am rather certain there are two co-captains. Slomo666 (talk) 22:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Slomo666 Actually yeah, you're right. I checked the source for this request and the pluralized "co-captains'" was picked up as italicized text in wikitext. Whoops :) This is now
Done in full. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 00:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Slomo666 Actually yeah, you're right. I checked the source for this request and the pluralized "co-captains'" was picked up as italicized text in wikitext. Whoops :) This is now
- I am rather certain there are two co-captains. Slomo666 (talk) 22:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Undue weight
[edit]CycoMa2, you've tagged this article as having undue weight on a European-American perspective, but it's not clear what content you're objecting to. It might help if you flagged the offending sections more specifically, or if you described what should be added/removed to the article. That would help any interested editors in addressing the issue, or help you figure out a plan if you want to edit the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 05:04, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Unjerked Meat
[edit]Went ahead and deleted that (admittedly kinda impressive and a little funny) vandalism. The source doesn't match what it said, and I feel confident trashng it. Hydronym89 (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- High-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- High-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- B-Class Montana articles
- Low-importance Montana articles
- WikiProject Montana articles
- B-Class Oregon articles
- High-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class American Old West articles
- Mid-importance American Old West articles
- WikiProject American Old West articles
- WikiProject United States articles


