Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
<discussion>
I propose that SSV Ulm 1846 Fußball be merged back into this article. There was only one article until July 2012, when this seperation was created. However, the football department is the most recognsiable department of the club and therefore the primary subject. Also, almost all links that lead to SSV Ulm 1846, and there is quite a few, relate to the association football department. The current seperation creates quite a mess in regards to links as most people are not aware of the existence of the SSV Ulm 1846 Fußball article. Calistemon (talk) 08:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support - no need for a separate article when no other section of the sport's club is notable, and indeed the club itself is barely notable. This is done on other similar articles where the football department is the clear PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman09:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.