Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2391068db5ef557

Jump to content

Talk:SPA AS.37

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tengu99 in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

There is some inconsistency in the naming of Wikipedia articles on Italian military vehicles. Sometimes it is just a number (e.g. TL.37), sometimes it includes the prefix SPA (e.g. SPA AS.37), sometimes it includes the name of the maker (e.g. SPA-Viberti AS.42). Could we please establish a consistent naming convention? Biscuittin (talk) 09:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

What does SPA signify? Is it an Italian military designation or does it mean Società per Azioni, the Italian term for a joint stock company? Biscuittin (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think SPA might indicate a vehicle built, or modified, for service in the Sahara desert. Can anyone confirm this? Biscuittin (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Regarding the naming confusion of the SPA AS.37/TL.37/SPA TL.37, I think I might be able to shed some light on the subject. After doing a bit more reading it appears that SPA is short for Società per Azioni, the Italian term for a joint stock as you stated. The original vehicle seems to have been the SPA TL.37 (Società per Azioni Artillery Tractor. Model 1937). From that point the SPA TL.37 aka TL.37 has "Libia" model by adding adding larger fuel tanks and better tires, and the SPA AS.37 is the SPA TL.37 with more modifications produced for Autocarro Sahariano. So as far as consistent naming convention I suggest using SPA TL.37 since the SPA AS.37 and SPA TL.37 “Libia” are subsets of the original. The separate SPA AS.37 and SPA TL.37 “Libia” stubs/articles should be merged under the SPA TL.37 article. Just my thoughts on the issue. Seansasser (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Agree that naming should be consistent. Either SPA TL.37, SPA AS.37, etc or just TL.37, AS.37, etc. Tengu99 (talk) 17:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply