Talk:SMS Schwaben

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Schwaben/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. The text states there were six 45 cm (18 in) torpedo tubes while the inf box has 5 × 45 cm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes
2. The footnote could use a cite
3. The inf box has - Fate: Scrapped in 1920 but the text says - battleship was stricken from the naval register on 8 March 1921 needs clarification

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

All three fixed, thanks for reviewing the article, Jim. Parsecboy (talk) 11:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

• Passed --Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Ranks correct?

"On 29 August, Kapitän zur See (Captain at Sea) Walter Engelhardt replaced Alberts aboard Schwaben." - A Captain replaces a Rear Admiral (KAdm=Konteradmiral=Rear Admiral)! Serious? Any sources for this? 80.151.9.187 (talk)

Um, yes, the source cited in that paragraph... Parsecboy (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)