Talk:SMS Elsass/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

*Scheer and Tarrant in references could have the publishing locations added. *Footnote 2 needs a reference *Schichau in the inf box goes to a disamb page *The text claims she had eighteen 8.8 cm (3.45 in) SK L/35 quick-firing guns but the inf box claims 14 *{cn} tag added at the end of the Service history section.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

All taken care of, thanks Jim. Parsecboy (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

All verified and article passed well done --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)