Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a240cc08dfbdcdd8

Jump to content

Talk:SITE Institute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Klbrain in topic To be confused with

Non-profit

[edit]

I see in the history there was a question about the group's non-profit status. Melissa Data confirms they are a registered non-profit organization. Note that non-profits can act exactly like businesses, e.g. selling professional services, without endangering their tax status; it's dependent on the ownership structure, not how they provide services. --Dhartung | Talk 17:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Secret Service Connections

[edit]

Looking at their history of publications and their ideological support for the "war on terror", there ought to be a sentence that includes the words mossad and cia. Sure, it may not be provable, but lots of "newspapers of record" have printed weapons of mass destruction together with Iraq in the same sentence. The language of our times is innuendo. The Matrix is all around us. [ref]the Matrix coincident[/ref] U2r2h (talk) 09:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

[edit]



108.58.107.174 (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

To be confused with

[edit]

Seems SITE Intelligence Group in fact IS exactly the same as this. Merge?פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 23:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge  The 2014 Independent profile refers to SITE’s activities in 2006 and 2007. SITE’s own “About” page says “MORE THAN TWO DECADES SITE Intelligence Group has provided . . .” Michael Z. 16:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support the proposal to merge, given the historical continuity of the two groups (with a change from an open to a for-profit status). The current, or most recently active, name though is the SITE Intelligence Group, suggesting that the merge should be to that page (not as currently tagged). Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply