Talk:SEQUAL framework

Context tag

I've added the context tag to this article again. It was removed by User:80.203.114.25 and replaced with the text "For evaluating the quality of models, the semiotic quality framework (SEQUAL), developed by John Krogstie, is introduced." I'm still not sure what the article is supposed to be about, although it appears to relate somehow to semiotics. What sort of models are we talking about exactly?

Additionally, I'm adding the inappropriate tone tag, as the article consists almost entirely of point-form notes. --Eloil 00:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

It concerns the modeling of information systems and Business processes. The sequal framework should have it's own page, though. No point in having it under the "quality of models" umbrella when the whole article concerns the framework. Also, other people have written about quality of models, e.g. Schneiderman --Fred 30 November 2007

Article renamed

I renamed this article from Quality of models to SEQUAL framework, because I supposed that this was the one framework John Krogstie about the "quality of models".

Now it seems Krogstie and others have suggested more multiple framework. If this article want's to describe all these frameworks, maybe this article should be renamed to

• Model quality framework
• Framework for quality of models

The term "Quality of models" was to general here. The "SEQUAL framework" seems to specific. At the moment "Framework for quality of models" seems to speak for itself the most.

-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)