Talk:SEC Network

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Baseball: College Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball.

The first game

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So there's been a disagreement here, so let me lay down the opinions I've gathered from me, other people, and popular opinion

Arguments for acknowledging the Rebels/Bulldogs game
- It was the first live sporting event televised by SEC Network
Arguments against acknowledging the Rebels/Bulldogs game
- Not important enough because a TV network of this caliber is expected to broadcast live sports
- Not important enough because it's not Division I college football
- It was not technically the first sporting event broadcast by SEC Network (the soccer shown on SEC Now/WatchESPN on launch day was)

So, let's discuss this. I'm somewhat neutral, but the arguments against seem to outweigh arguments for. ViperSnake151 Talk 02:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply