Talk:SD card/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vincent60030 (talk · contribs) 08:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

I would say the article needs some major citation additions since it's not well referenced in some sections.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   Well, many sections and subsections are not well referenced and there are also citation needed tags

   C. No original research:

   No original research implemented, good!

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   It is fair, eventhough there is information about false SD cards sold.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Some pictures are with some copyright issues, but are not major copyright issues.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   It's ok, you don't need to be too upset. Try to add suitable inline citations and reliable sources. Also, try to have the images in the article to have no copyright issues. Generally it is a good B-class article.