Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2268ff64bd1dafe

Jump to content

Talk:SDHB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 130.60.6.54 in topic Is SDHA a tumor suppressor gene or not?

moved out of unassessed on the genetics project

[edit]

1/19/17 DennisPietras (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is paranglionic a typo?

[edit]

I see many occurrences of the word paraganglioma and a handful of paraganglionic in this article but only one 'paranglionic' in the section on Impaired developmental apoptosis [second para, third sentence.]

I am not an expert, but this appears to be a typo. The 6-char sequence paraga seems to have been shortened to 'para'. Google finds only 141 occurrences of 'paranglionic' (versus 63,300 for paraganglionic), which mostly seem to derive from the English abstract of a 1995 Portuguese article by FR Silva.

There is a similar issue with 'paranglioma' instead of paraganglioma in the Wikipedia article on SDHD. Google finds more references in this case, but, for example, the Amazon.com category for 'paranglioma' refers to a book with paraganglia in the title.

- amoluf

Is SDHA a tumor suppressor gene or not?

[edit]

This article says "Note the SDHA gene is not a tumor suppressor gene." without specifying any source, while the article about SDHA says the contrary "SDHA is a tumour suppressor gene" and provides a source reference [10]. Which statement is correct? 130.60.6.54 (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply