Talk:SCSI Enclosure Services
Add topicLatest comment: 9 months ago by Thebiguglyalien in topic Merge proposal
 | SCSI standalone enclosure services was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 8 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Chidgk1 (talk · contribs) on 10 October 2023. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge proposal
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose to merge Enclosure Services Interface here. The ESI article has no sources and very low coverage, probably no standalone WP:N (many mentions in literature are actually about an interface to physical enclosures, not SCSI, cf. ). ESI is just one of the interfaces used for communications to a SCSI enclosure controller. Викидим (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose – ESI is a much older and likely long obsolete protocol, SES is current and extremely common. If need be, perhaps a collective enclosure services article would make sense, but I'm not so sure about that either. --Zac67 (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- (comment) Thank you for a thoughtful answer. We also have SES-2 Enclosure Management and SAF-TE, used to have SCSI standalone enclosure services (merged here). T10 appears to be very prolific, so I am looking into the sources for a collective article as described by you. Викидим (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Викидим, is this something you're still interested in? The merge proposal has been pending for a few months. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 00:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I am still interested. However, as a nominator of the proposal that had seen opposition, I am an involved user and cannot do much until someone else closes the discussion. WP:MERGECLOSE has the details. Викидим (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.