Talk:SCIEX
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Kvng in topic Notability
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Resubmission of article after rejection
[edit]After rejection for sounding like an advertisement, I have removed 3 references that were from company sources. The references are now from either refereed scientific journals (10) or from government or university archives or from business magazines. I have also removed material that might be considered promotional, and have re-submitted for approval. Brucet8585 (talk) 02:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]indicates notability but does not include a lot of direct coverage. is second best. Others are not so strong making the case for notability admittedly marginal so take it to AfD if you think I've made a bad call accepting this. ~Kvng (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)