Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Latest comment: 5 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion
Hi, does anyone have a better photo to replace the one that's currently in the infobox? The current photo features a version with the cutouts, which are strictly for demonstration, and not a photo of a functional rifle. It also cuts off at the muzzle, has an extra attachment on the scope that is not common, and is quite small in size. A photo of a standard-issue SAR 21 would be much better, preferably in use by SAF personnel, I just don't know how to go about acquiring an original photo myself. Any inputs? - Sentimex (talk) 22:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Robertsky, Now that I think about it, perhaps the picture in the infobox shouldn't be depicted in use by anyone? I think most articles on Wikipedia on firearms show them on their own, not being held. It's probably the least obstructed view of the entire gun. Hopefully there's someone out there who could get a photo of the gun on its own? Sorry, I should have through it through before including the comment. - Sentimex (talk) 01:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sentimex, unless there's an exhibition, you won't get a clear photo. the last i checked, the closest bet is at the army museum, but it is currently closed for a refresh. – robertsky (talk) 02:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Seloloving I was referring to the comment I made suggesting my preference for a person using the gun. I take it back now that I have thought about it.
Robertsky Oh well, here's hoping that someone happens to have a better photo. Thanks for the suggestion! May I ask if there is some way for users to upload images that are not original works but might be in the public domain? - Sentimex (talk) 02:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sentimex, unfortunately, all of the photos there (barring one already on Wikipedia) do not have adequate sources on where they come from. As such, we are unable to properly ascertain their copyright status. A few also seem to be professional shots which may have been taken off the manufacturers or professional websites. Copyright rules state that the photos must be released under an open license (with proof), or that you take the photographs yourself. I apologise for the late reply. Seloloving (talk) 05:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply