Talk:Rusiate Rogoyawa

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 10:44, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Rusiate Rogoyawa saw snow for the first time in 1982 and competed at the Winter Olympics six years later?

• Source:

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Don Summers

5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 58 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 15:50, 4 July 2025 (UTC).

• The article is expanded five times and is free of copyright violations. QPQ has been done, and the hook is interesting. However, there is an issue. Upon looking at the sources that you provided, there was a conflicting year when Rogoyawa saw the snow for the first time. According to Ledger-Enquirer and Calgary Herald, the year was 1982, while The Baltimore Sun stated that it was in 1983. Can you address this issue? After that, the hook can be promoted. Faldi00 (talk) 16:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
  • @Faldi00: Done. :) Arconning (talk) 03:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
    • @Arconning: Well done and thanks for the revision. I endorse this hook to be promoted. Faldi00 (talk) 22:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rusiate Rogoyawa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: EF5 (talk · contribs) 14:39, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Will be starting this review tomorrow. ^EF⁵ 14:39, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

@EF5 Any updates? Arconning (talk) 12:49, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No issues.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   No issues with references, although remove the Olympedia link in the "external links" section as it's already used as a citation.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article is short, but there doesn't seem to be a ton about him.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Don't see any WP:PEACOCK words or anything non-neutral.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Last "major" edit was a 1,000-byte removal on July 18.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The single image needs alt text per MOS:ALT.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   A few concerns, but nothing major due to the article's size. Will be doing spotcheck soon.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.