Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245ecf42d972877

Jump to content

Talk:Runyon v. McCrary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is 90% of this article about the dissenting opinon?

[edit]

Eight judges agree and there is nothing about their opinion? One judge dissents and most of the article is exclusively about that? Talk about fair and balanced. -- 212.63.43.180 (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Two parties, only one mentioned (briefly)

[edit]

This legal case involed two parties: 1) Runyon and 2) McCrary.

Apparently McCrary was a potential student who had been denied entry to a university, from what I can tell.

Who the frig is Runyon?

Both these people should be mentioned in the article - preferably in the lede! --98.122.20.56 (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Found this: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1975/75-62  Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.20.56 (talk) 19:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • The case is named for Russell and Katheryne Runyon d.b.a. Bobbe's School. Bobbe's and Fairfax-Brewster were private schools, not colleges. I added text to the article. In a Supreme Court case, the identity of the petitioners and their backstories are not of the greatest import. Rhadow (talk) 11:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply