Talk:Rule of Faith
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Romanists?
[edit]I know that this a copy of the original text, but I believe 'Romanists' should be changed to 'Catholics' or 'Roman Catholics'. It's written in such a quaint style as well, so maybe it should be 'modernised' as well.
Early Church Usage
[edit]This article doesn't capture the meaning of this phrase in Early Church usage, especially in Irenaeus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.33.104 (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Analogia Entis
[edit]The paragraph on Analogia Entis seems to be there by mistake, or out of some rambling. We start with The Rule of Faith, go down the garden path of The Analogy of Faith, then end up at the Analogy of Being. It is the notion that the very being (entis) of the created world offers an analogy by which we can (in a very limited way) comprehend God. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 09:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Rick Jelliffe Agreed. Also this section is headed "Orthodox usage" - whereas it seems to revolve around Protestants and Aquinas. Nothing to do with Eastern Orthodox or Oriental Orthodox traditions at all. FreddieRainbow (talk) 10:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have removed the sibsection Analoguaventis. (I have been preparing an actual article on the subject, a little difficult because everyone puts it in a different scope.) Rick Jelliffe (talk) 06:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)