Talk:Rudstone
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by VoidHalo in topic Better images are needed. Particularly macroscopic/wider shots of better quality specimens
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Better images are needed. Particularly macroscopic/wider shots of better quality specimens
[edit]The 2 pictures included here don't really give any indication as to what rudstone looks like on a more macroscopic level. Say, if you were to find it in the wild. I came here hoping to identify a potential rudstone deposite by the image, which is usually good quality for these articles. Unfortunately, we just have these extreme close ups that don't give any idea what it actually looks like.
Conclusion: I believe we need to source a freely available image of confirmed rudstone. If possible, of course.
I appreciate any help you guys provide. VoidHalo (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)