Talk:Ruby Spark
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by DanCherek in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Ruby Spark appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Sources
[edit]- Casualty trailer analysis
- A closer look at Ruby
- Ruby introduction
- Inside Soap magazine article 14-20 July 2018 - Maddy Hill interview
- Maddy Hill interview
- Maddy Hill interview
- Maddy Hill interview
- Maddy Hill interview
- Reaction to Ruby's introduction
- Reaction to Ruby's introduction
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by DanCherek (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
( )
- ...
that actress Maddy Hill qualified to drive a Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) for her role as Ruby Spark in Casualty?Source: "I spent two days on a course with truckers in Somerset, and I'm now qualified to drive an HGV."- ALT1:... that due to her Casualty character Ruby Spark's near-photographic memory, actress Maddy Hill had to learn all the intricate details of the spoken medical terminology? Source: "But part of Ruby's character is that she has a semi-photographic memory, so she never needs to do any of that – she remembers all of it and it's always really detailed. It's been a challenge, but one that I really enjoy."
- Reviewed: Route 128 station
- Comment: Feel free to pick either hook or suggest a new one.
Moved to mainspace by Soaper1234 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC).
The article is long enough and new enough. There are no copyright violations - the quotes are properly attributed. A QPQ has been completed. I am approving ALT1 as the most interesting. SL93 (talk) 02:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
