Talk:Ruby Rose Turner

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that American actress Ruby Rose Turner debuted as a dancer Spanish-language show Sábado Gigante at the age of seven?

• Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20251212063243/https://www.naijanews.com/buzz/people/who-is-ruby-rose-turner-how-old-is-she-here-are-facts-you-need-to-know/ (original link doesnt work, but i was able to find an archived link)

• • ALT1: ... that American actress Ruby Rose Turner debuted as a dancer at the age of seven, winning a number of minor national competitions? Source: as above
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sydney Craven
  • Comment: Article was created by BrookTheHumming, and moved to mainspace by Pppery via AFC. I made some substantial edits to the article, hence why I'm also crediting myself. I've later added Afrowriter to the credits as I forgot to do so

Created by JuniperChill (talk), BrookTheHumming (talk) and Afrowriter (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.

JuniperChill (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2026 (UTC).

@JuniperChill Not giving me any credit for editing and cleaning it up into a properly formatted and notable article before submitting it is wild. 😒😒 Afro 📢Talk! 21:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

My bad, i have done that now JuniperChill (talk) 21:32, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• PS: I'm also planning to get this to WP:GA (good article status), which is why I've made quite a lot of edits since i needed to check every source verifies what is being said in the article. This took more work than I expected JuniperChill (talk) 19:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
  • And now its passed GA yesterday, even before this had a chance to be reviewed for DYK. What are the chances of that? :) JuniperChill (talk) 11:27, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
    • DYK includes Good articles, so that's not a problem.----3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 20:55, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
      • this was clearly a rhetorical question, seeing as GANs can take several months to be reviewed, whereas with DYK, its within two months. JuniperChill (talk) 08:15, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Was new enough at time of nomination, and then was a Good Article just outside 7 days of this review. AGF on the archived source since IA is down right now (please people, donate!) Passes copyvio check easily. Well done. Approved for either hook which both are variations on the same interesting fact.----3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 20:55, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the review @3family6: However, you forgot to put an approved check mark. I would note that I couldn't edit due to a heatwave for me JuniperChill (talk) 08:15, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ruby Rose Turner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: JuniperChill (talk · contribs) 22:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey! I will review this within the next week :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you Danilo! This reminds me of when I reviewed your Matilda Freeman nomination in late 2025 so I now loved that we reviewed/nominated each other in GAN and DYK! JuniperChill (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

I love that too! We work well together DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Review:

Hey, well done on the article! It is well written, well sourced and I cannot see any major issues. Earwig shows no major copyright violations and I cannot see any edit warring or unreliable sources. I just have a few comments:

1. I do not think " actress, singer, and dancer" need to be linked (I am not against them being linked but I think it goes against MOS:OVERLINK)

done

1. Could you please move the refs in the lead down? As they are not needed.

done

1. "supportive family" seems more like an opinion - could you please clarify this? E.g. "her family supported her with her acting career" or perhaps a quote from her?

i've simply removed that statement as the source doesn't support it

1. "She spent four years training in competitive dance, earning a number of minor national competitions and awards" - Can you please clarify if this was separate from Sábado Gigante?

im not sure tbh, seeing as the source isn't clear

1. What was the tribute for?

it was a tribute performance; ive clarified it

1. "showcasing her musical and dance skills" and "Her performance was complemented" - These sounds a bit unneutral, can they please be reworded?

done

1. Can you please clarify what "The Mirror" is?

done/expanded

1. Can you mention "Someone Saved My Life" in the prose?

done

1. Can you please mention if she sung, acted and/or danced in the three music videos?

done i guess

1. I merged a few of the short paragraphs together and added a "ref" column to the filmography table to make it clearer.
2. In the filmography section, can you please add a note in the "notes" row of the last two credits to show that they are upcoming releases?
3. Burlap is unsourced in the table and in the prose - is it possible to find a source anywhere? Maybe this?

done

1. Is there any information on her personal life and/or what critics thought of her?

Regarding the 'personal life', The only thing I could give is that she has lots of hobbies and interests, really likes dancing and swimming, and is very close to her family saying "we're inseperable". I guess I could put that at the top of the early life and career section instead if its own section isnt warranted. (using Matilda Freeman#Personal life as a guide)JuniperChill (talk) 21:35, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

1. Would it be possible to source the "television" table for consistency?
2. It is not essential, but would it be possible to link the newspapers/websites (e.g. People) in the sources to aid readers?

Once these have been addressed I will do a source spotchek and pass the article! Well done for your hard work - please let me know if you need any help at all :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:52, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article Danilo! I plan to make these changes perhaps next week since I just had one of my nominated GANs promoted today after spending over an hour on it, and I also have two GANs to review. This exactly explained why I took more than a couple of weeks between opening your Matilda review and closing it as it was also a backlog drive back then. JuniperChill (talk) 19:30, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

I have performed some of your suggestions, but i need to sleep now, seeing as I've been editing all day and are working tomorrow. I plan to carry on with this later JuniperChill (talk) 22:56, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives I guess ive done everything, including adding the personal life section! I would note that this was a challenge, especially since its an article i didn't create. You could see (from the page history) that i was checking sources and editing the article if necessary. And its even more impressive that this hasn't even been reviewed by DYK yet! Getting a GA reviewed before DYK is such an achievement, not to mention that I nominated it for DYK two days before GAN! :) JuniperChill (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the changes! I have spotchecked Sources #8, #13, #18, #27 and #34. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.