Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2316a155de1f814

Jump to content

Talk:Ruby Ridge standoff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination


The Dog

[edit]

Should the dog be listed as a causality in the infobox? 2605:4A80:7400:8500:FD55:CA73:DBC4:ED07 (talk) 02:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

No. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Court Date

[edit]

I removed from the infobox and the lead the mention that Randy Weaver was given the wrong court date. As they appeared in the article before my edit, these mentions were quite misleading. After all, it could be a defense if Weaver was given the wrong court date. The problem was that the body notes that Weaver never appeared in Court for the March 20 date he was told either. That fact is conveniently omitted from the WP:LEAD. In fact, the body notes that Weaver was convicted for failure to appear in court. Nothing in the sources indicates that the conviction was a miscarriage of justice. As for the comment from @Naaman Brown on this talk page 18 years ago (wow, that's a long time!), yes, it's understandable to think that Weaver at that point had an understandable fear that he would not be treated fairly in court. But courts would be foolish to allow such general fears as a defense to a failure to appear charge. Thus, MOS:CONCISE counsels removing these defenses that did not prevent a conviction from the lead and infobox.

Finally, as @HandThatFeeds notes this year, the Seattle Times article was published during the trial and has not been updated to consider that Weaver was convicted for failure to appear in court. This is not to say that it is WP:BIASED, but the article merely presents arguments from defense counsel, and does not come to the conclusion that Weaver was innocent of the charges. Ilvekset (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected, closed by Launchballer (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

    • Reviewed:
5x expanded by Hotrodguy84 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Hotrodguy84 (talk) 10:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC).Reply