Talk:Ruby Ridge standoff
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruby Ridge standoff article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 21, 2012. |
| On 2 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Ruby Ridge to Ruby Ridge standoff. The result of the discussion was moved. |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
The Dog
[edit]Should the dog be listed as a causality in the infobox? 2605:4A80:7400:8500:FD55:CA73:DBC4:ED07 (talk) 02:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Wrong Court Date
[edit]I removed from the infobox and the lead the mention that Randy Weaver was given the wrong court date. As they appeared in the article before my edit, these mentions were quite misleading. After all, it could be a defense if Weaver was given the wrong court date. The problem was that the body notes that Weaver never appeared in Court for the March 20 date he was told either. That fact is conveniently omitted from the WP:LEAD. In fact, the body notes that Weaver was convicted for failure to appear in court. Nothing in the sources indicates that the conviction was a miscarriage of justice. As for the comment from @Naaman Brown on this talk page 18 years ago (wow, that's a long time!), yes, it's understandable to think that Weaver at that point had an understandable fear that he would not be treated fairly in court. But courts would be foolish to allow such general fears as a defense to a failure to appear charge. Thus, MOS:CONCISE counsels removing these defenses that did not prevent a conviction from the lead and infobox.
Finally, as @HandThatFeeds notes this year, the Seattle Times article was published during the trial and has not been updated to consider that Weaver was convicted for failure to appear in court. This is not to say that it is WP:BIASED, but the article merely presents arguments from defense counsel, and does not come to the conclusion that Weaver was innocent of the charges. Ilvekset (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected, closed by Launchballer (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- ... that the Ruby Ridge standoff was triggered after a federal office mailed the defendant Randy Weaver a letter listing an incorrect court date?
- Reviewed:
Hotrodguy84 (talk) 10:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC).
This nomination fails WP:DYKCRIT. It was not 5x expanded, nor does it meet other eligibility guidelines (for newness or as a Good Article). Ruby2010 (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Selected anniversaries (August 2012)
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class FBI articles
- High-importance FBI articles
- WikiProject FBI articles
- C-Class United States Government articles
- Mid-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles

