Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220293dbbb3ae97

Jump to content

Talk:Rubus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-33779-71 in topic 2023 Phylogeny

Rubus coreanus

[edit]

Is there a species called Rubus coreanus? Badagnani (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why is all of this from 16 or 17 years Ago 47.144.177.18 (talk) 03:45, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Added. Badagnani (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Book

[edit]

This book contains some useful information that could be used to improve the article. MP (talkcontribs) 21:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merging "Bramble" with this page

[edit]

The word bramble is used as a synonym for either blackberries specifically, or for Rubus more generally. Either way, there is no point in having a separate article called "Bramble", so I propose that the useful parts of its content be merged into this page. Gabbe (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Gabbe: Agreed. The information presented here does not warrant a separate article. Go for it! Lepidoptera (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Reviving this discussion, because as far as I can tell, the term "bramble" is basically synonymous with Rubus. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree, I think they should be merged. Averixus (talk) 06:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I also agree. I note the claim in Bramble that "Bramble" is also used to describe other prickly shrubs, such as roses (Rosa species), which might justify a separate article, is supposedly supported by a reference that actually says any prickly shrub belonging to the genus Rubus, of the rose family. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Peter coxhead: @Averixus: I've redirected bramble and merged some of its content into this article. I ommitted a lot of it as I thought it was either unencyclopedic (like a weeding guide), or uncited. Do you think there's any other content worth merging. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Hemiauchenia: there's some stuff about ecology that ought to be in a Rubus article, but as you note it's not fully cited. Ditto uses. So I agree with your merges. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Massive revision of Rubus taxonomy

[edit]

"Target Capture Sequencing Unravels Rubus Evolution" Dec 2019 Open access. One of the biggest updates to Rubus taxonomy in decades, several subgenera found to be polyphyletic, anybody interested in updating the article? Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Polyploidy- definintion

[edit]

"Polyploidy (having more than two pairs of each chromosome)" but the linked page on polyploidy says: "more than one pair of (homologous) chromosomes" Eaberry (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well spotted! Fixed. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 23:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge this with Rubeae

[edit]

Rubus is the only genus in Rubeae so why not merge the two ZKevinTheCat (talk) 20:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

2023 Phylogeny

[edit]

This article really needs to be updated with the species in their correct subgenuses based on huang 2023, which is widely accepted now (also see Chen 2026) ~2026-33779-71 (talk) 04:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply