Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225a4943c5dd287

Jump to content

Talk:Ruapuke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Johnragla in topic Demographics

Untitled

[edit]

This article is in its infancy and will expand into the history and characters of the area. There is a body of evidence thats supports a theory that a mohogany ship wreck seen on Ruapuke beach around 300 years ago, with some supporting artifacts and fragmnent found since, support a theory that the Chinese came to NZ well before Captain Cook arrived and that the indiginous maori people are actual descendents of these Asians.. Lets run with this for a while???

Thanks dragon fly..please continue. Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.145.238 (talkcontribs) 9 May 2006 (UTC)

The style of this article doesn't even begin to approach encyclopedic - it sounds like a feature in a travel magazine. Please stick to sourced facts. dramatic (talk) 23:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Demographics

[edit]

@Johnragla: Since 2018, Stats NZ does not release the populationdemographics of meshblocks for free. According to they can be purchased, along with most of the other demographics data Wikipedia usually reports, for $620+gst.

The article currently states it uses meshblocks 0853300 and 0861800 for Ruapuke. I hope the first of these is a typo, because 0853300 is on the western side of Glen Massey. The correct meshblocks for Ruapuke are 0861502 and 0861800. These cover 33.68+55.77 = 89.45 square kilometres.

In most other NZ articles, we use SA1 areas as the smallest unit (data is freely available for these). 08533000861502 corresponds to 7029980 (33.68 square km; population 90 in 2023) and to the larger 7011306 (45.25 square km; population 189 in 2018), but 0861800 is part of the much larger 7011317 SA1 (141.85 square km; population 192 in 2023), and goes much further east than anything considered part of Ruapuke.

I am not inclined to purchase the meshblock demographics, nor to ask the WikiMedia Foundation to purchase them for me, because there would be only a few cases like this one where they would be useful, and the work to parse the data manually or to write a script to parse them automatically (as I have written for the SA1 and larger units) would seem excessive for these few cases. These financial and time costs would recur with each census.

For the present, I will leave the existing demographics alone, and hope the first meshblock is the correct one. If anyone thinks the SA1 demographics are more appropriate, I can add those, or anyone else can copy and past the output from below.-Gadfium (talk) 02:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Gadfium: Thanks for that information. I don't know where the meshblock number came from, but I've corrected it. Johnragla (talk) 04:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)Reply