Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226e82f3a1c3524

Jump to content

Talk:Roy Field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that visual effects artist Roy Field worked on the first seven official James Bond films? Source: Films from Dr. No to Diamonds Are Forever listed at:"Roy Field BSC". British Society of Cinematographers. Retrieved 17 December 2021. You can find a list of the official (Eon) films anywhere but I've provided this source in the article: Caplen, Robert A. (2010). Shaken & Stirred: The Feminism of James Bond. Robert Caplen. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-4535-1282-1.

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 09:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC).Reply

Dumelow, the article is newly created, well written, long enough, neutral, with no BLP problems, contains appropriate citations, does not contain overly close paraphrasing. A QPQ has been done and looks fine. I have added a couple of words to the text. Hook also looks OK and is cited. This is my first review, let me know if I've missed anything. TSventon (talk) 23:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review TSventon, I think you covered everything - Dumelow (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
To T:DYK/P6