Talk:Rotaxane
Add topic | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]are there any puffy orbital diagrams of rotaxanes these strut things are only saying some of whats going on This is a puffy orbital picture http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/talks/mobius/5.html of a Charged Möbius Annulene with rotaxane like nature
previous comments
[edit]—Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.237.215.179 (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Here is a reference about Topological Bonds. Does not apply to rotaxanes. http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/jpcafh/2004/108/i14/abs/jp037627z.html M stone 09:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
I am having difficulty adding the Gibson group html link. It is http://www.chem.vt.edu/chem-dept/gibson/gibson.html. Please help fix?--Hokietiki@hotmail.com 15:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
The Leigh lab link is dead, January 24, 2008.Hokietiki@hotmail.com (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The last link to a pictorial representation of a rotaxane is dead, January 24, 2008.Hokietiki@hotmail.com (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, the dead links have been removed. V8rik (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
3 Rotaxane
[edit]Is there an actual reason, beyond what little is demonstrated by the article itself, why 3 Rotaxane needs a separate article from the main one on rotaxanes? Bearcat (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rotaxane/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| The rotaxane article has developed images, basic history, defined importance within the context of chemistry and several references. It is therefore within the context of a "B" class article. Further, its importance to organic chemistry, supramolecular chemistry and material sciences is well established and is therefore of at least "mid" importance. Jeremiah 15:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 15:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)