Talk:Rotating Regional Primary System

Untitled

The National Association of Secretaries of State has endorsed this plan, it is one of the three most-mentioned plans out there. It is directly referenced in the literature for the American Plan itself. Multiple sources of verification have been added to this page.

Multiple external references and sources have been added. That should be sufficient, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.188.247.5 (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The "one group" mentioned that supports this proposal is composed of the Secretaries of State of the 50 states. It is directly mentioned in the proposal for the American Plan. I have no idea how high the bar is for notability, but I'm certain that this reaches it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.179.163.175 (talk) 12:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

NH, IA Bias

I removed this crap: "Why should a new regional primary system, set up with a plan to rotate which region would go first, continue allowing these two states with strongly atypical demographics to have an undue influence in choosing America's president?"

This is not a forum, people. If you want to discuss this issue, don't discuss it here. -Laikalynx (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Retail politics

What on earth does this term mean? Can someone find a source for the term and define it in the article?--~TPW 14:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)