Talk:Rossburn
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Vandalism
[edit]This page has been vandalized more than once --Shruti14 t c s 22:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, it has been. People on the Rossburn Collegiate Institute network are usually the culprits. Less intelligent people from Grade 9 to Grade 12. Personally, I don't see why they have to do this. They're making it harder for the rest of us. Besides that, this article seems more of an advertisement than anything.--Boinciel (talk) 14:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
The section about quality of life is not reasonable
[edit]I've been to Rossburn and although there is nothing extremely wrong with it, the quality of life isn't what I would call high. The people seem quite average. The weather is horrible there for most of the year and everybody gossips about everybody. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.127.193.43 (talk) 04:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
What is this, a travel brochure?
[edit]I don't think this is very 'encyclopedic', but it certainly makes me want to visit Rossburn! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.147.120.178 (talk) 22:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.town.rossburn.mb.ca/pag_cms_id_92_p_demographics.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)