Talk:Rose-Tu
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Another Believer in topic Assessment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rose-Tu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk · contribs) in the past. It was contested by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk · contribs) |
| Tula-Tu was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 27 February 2025 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment
[edit]@GreenLipstickLesbian: Thanks for your work on this article! Curious if you think the assessment should be upgraded to 'B' class, or if you have plans to nominate for Good article status? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class animal articles
- Low-importance animal articles
- WikiProject Animals articles
- C-Class mammal articles
- Low-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- C-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles